วันอาทิตย์ที่ 25 มกราคม พ.ศ. 2552

Stashing your cash? Hide it in a safe place


BY SUSAN CARPENTER
Los Angeles Times Service
Mattresses are so obvious. If you really want to keep cash in the house, stash it in a child's toy or a cereal box or a curtain rod. Don't hide it anywhere you've seen in a movie. And don't put it in a sock. Those are some of the suggestions circulating among cash stashers online as increasing numbers of Americans grow ever more wary of the global financial system.

Never mind that in 2009, U.S. bank and credit union accounts of up to $250,000 are covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

As Americans face a triple whammy of declines in the stock, housing and job markets, they're looking for financial security. And some of them are indulging their fears by stuffing bills that had been destined for savings accounts into repurposed peanut-butter jars and tampon boxes and fire-resistant safes.

For Georg Lindsay, 22, it's her Kia that's become a quasi bank -- specifically, the pull-out ashtray and the pocket of space beneath the driver's seat. She also has stashed cash in an old purse and a hand-me-down bamboo cup from her grandmother. Lindsay started hiding money four years ago when she found herself out of work for several months.

''I was like, OK. You better stash whatever money you come across,'' said Lindsay, from Oak Grove, Ala., who was recently discussing money-hiding strategies on the social networking site Gaia Online.

A teddy bear, a picture frame and a narcotics safe from an old hospital were among the suggestions from the cadre of teenagers and twentysomethings who participated in the discussion.

As the economy crumbles and fiscal safety nets disappear, cash stashing is crossing generational and psychological divides, the behavioral pattern expanding beyond what had long been the domain of seniors and paranoiacs.

The world's largest safe manufacturer, SentrySafe, has seen a 30 percent to 50 percent increase in sales since September 2008. Hollandia International, which incorporates Safe-T safes on its ''extreme luxury beds,'' has sold more than 400 of the $800 add-ons since they became available last summer.

Online retailer Keeping Women Safe has seen a 15 percent jump in sales of its ''diversion safes'' -- money hideaways that are disguised to look like everyday household products, such as carpet cleanser, deodorant sticks and cans of potato chips. Paint buckets and soda cans are the site's bestselling diversion safes, said owner Ted Kollins.

''I'm not sure why,'' he said. ``If I were a criminal or the IRS coming to look in a house, paint cans and jars are the first place I would look.''

Cash stasher Shawn Forno, 26, said he tries to choose locations that seem obvious to him but ridiculous to someone who might be looking for money.

''If it tickles your fancy and yours alone, it is a great hiding place,'' he said. ``If you ever need a map or a string tied around your finger to remember it, try harder.''

Forno's first stash for cash was a tin can buried under something few would want to touch: a heaping pile of dirty laundry. That was two years ago, when Forno was working as a bartender and couch surfing with roommates. Since then, he has used a disco ball, an old VHS case and the lining of some never-to-be-worn-again raver pants.

Just be sure to remember where you hid the money. In October, a woman nearly lost $10,000 when she accidentally returned a box of crackers -- with an envelope stuffed full of $100 bills.

Financial researcher Jack Marrion understands the impulse to stash cash.

'It's the old, `If the bank fails and I can't get my money' logic,'' said Marrion, who finds the idea unwise.

The loss of money inside a home is not covered by homeowner's insurance, and banks and credit unions covered by the FDIC have never lost a penny of covered funds, said Marrion, who is also the president of SafeMoneyPlaces.com.

''The odds are much, much, much higher of having the money stolen than having the money lost,'' Marrion said. ``There are no FDIC failures, but there are burglaries.''

วันเสาร์ที่ 17 มกราคม พ.ศ. 2552

Building loophole shuts mans out of his own home


Jesse James DeConto, Staff Writer

CHAPEL HILL - Andrew Dykers' home could fit four times inside a typical 2,000-square-foot home, but there's no room for it in state or local building codes.
So it has sat empty for nearly three months, and he has had to rent an apartment instead.

The problem is defining the building. It's a log cabin on wheels. It's an RV with solid-pine paneling, stainless-steel appliances and a hot tub. It's a custom-built trailer on concrete piers.

Dykers, a 35-year-old musician planning to attend N.C. Central law school next fall, had it built in upstate New York and installed at a mobile home park off Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in August. Two months later, the town revoked his building permit because the building lacked the necessary certification, effectively evicting him from his home.

Dykers is fighting city hall, and so far he's losing. Town officials have tried to work with him, but they feel bound by the law.

"I have to succeed," he said. "I have to live in my home."

By law, mobile homes have to be certified by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. This typically happens in the factories where they're built. Dykers' wasn't because his small-scale, custom builders, Adirondack Kabins, can't afford HUD certification.

Other types of factory-built homes have to be certified by the North Carolina Modular Construction Program. But, again, Dykers' builders don't do enough business in North Carolina to warrant getting the necessary certification from several states away.

"It just happens to be something that's not really regulated," said Kristin Milam, a spokeswoman for the N.C. Department of Insurance, which has tried to help Dykers.

Dykers spent months designing the interior, complete with a laundry room, a sleeping loft, a ceramic-tiled bathroom, quartz countertops, built-in wardrobes and dresser, and a screened porch.

The builders advertise the structure as an RV, but its exterior frame is 40-square-feet too big for that classification, and its permanent setting and 100-amp electric service push it further outside the norm.

State and local officials have spent many hours trying to solve Dykers' problem. It now appears he'll need to hire a third-party inspector to sign off on the safety of the home.

The $1,800 cost for the inspection is a sticking point right now. He thinks the town ought to inspect his home, as they would any other single-family home.

But Town Manager Roger Stancil said town inspectors can't inspect it as a single-family house without tearing open walls and floors to see the wiring and plumbing. Dykers is better off hiring a third-party inspector who would inspect it as a modular home, Stancil said.

Dykers has already spent about $2,100 renting a basement apartment while he tries to legalize his trailer. All this to try to save some money.

jesse.deconto@newsobserver.com or 932-8760